April 18, 2007

The Purpose of Grief

What is grieving for and what purpose does it serve?

Dennis Prager understands more about the nature of grief than some of the university officials at VT who planned the convocation "to begin the healing process" in You're Dead, I'm Healing.

I believe that this early healing talk is both foolish and immoral.

It is foolish because one does not speak about healing the same day (or week or perhaps even month) that one is traumatized -- especially by evil. One must be allowed time for anger and grief. To speak of healing and "closure" before one goes through those other emotions is to speak not of healing but of suppression.

Not to allow people time to experience their natural, and noble, instincts to feel rage and grief actually deprives them of the ability to heal in the long run. After all, if there is no rage and grief, what is there to heal from?

Dr. Sanity is even better on the importance of proper grieving.

Indeed. There is this strange belief among the intellectual elites; even among many psychiatrists and mental health professionals that feeling anguish and grief are wrong and must be avoided at all cost. Or if you must feel them, then they must be instantly transformed into a focus on this thing called "healing"....

These well-meant but ultimately invalidating pressures to "begin the healing process" actually hinder the natural expression of normal grief, which can only come about after painful reflection and the resolution of a variety of conflicting emotions, including anger, sadness, hopelessness, outrage and regret (to name just a few).

Appropriate mourning also requires coming to terms with the nature and manner of the loss; a quest for justice on behalf of the victim when appropriate; and even the painful re-living and re-experiencing of what happened; until it can be completely processed and internally metabolized.

It hurts and hurts and hurts. But that is how we grow.
---

The major ingredient of a normal grieving process is time. It cannot, nor should it be expected to, be resolved or "healed" in a day, or a few days, or even a month or two. For the families of those who died, it may take years and years.

She ends. 

If nothing else, we owe it to the memory of those we have lost not to "heal" too quickly, but to take the time to experience the pain and suffering of their loss; transforming it slowly into personal growth and wisdom.

Posted by Jill Fallon at April 18, 2007 8:58 AM | Permalink
Comments

I agree that grief is healthy and there is nothing wrong with expressing it. I also agree it’s dangerous to deny it. Sometimes, though, grief takes time to rear its head—maybe even years. I know many people who’ve been consumed by addictions and negative behaviors to avoid dealing with grief. This leads me to my conclusion: when people talk about beginning the healing process, they aren’t talking about denying grief to get over the loss—they’re talking about working toward accepting it. Healing isn’t an alternative to grieving; it’s a direct result of allowing the grieving process to occur naturally.

In regards to banning the convocation, I don’t think the ban has anything to do with hastening closure. I think it’s about forgetting a tragedy as quickly and painlessly as possible. And that, for some, is to how to deal with grief.

Lori Deschene

Posted by: Lori Deschene at April 20, 2007 4:33 PM